LSAT Sample Questions
6 practice questions with complete answer explanations.
Sample Questions
City Council member: We should build the new library downtown because studies show libraries increase nearby property values. Which of the following, if true, most weakens the council member's argument?
Explanation
(C) undermines the applicability of the cited evidence โ suburban data may not apply to downtowns. Other answers are irrelevant or too weak.
All successful startups have a clear product-market fit. Therefore, if a company lacks product-market fit, it will fail. The argument's reasoning is flawed because it:
Explanation
Clear PMF is necessary for success per the premise; concluding that lacking it guarantees failure IS the correct logical move. Wait โ actually this reverses the logic correctly. Let me reconsider: 'All S have PMF' โ PMF is necessary. 'Lacks PMF โ fails' is contrapositive of 'Success โ PMF', which is valid. So the argument is NOT actually flawed in the traditional sense. For a clearer example, the intended flaw answer (A) would apply only if the original said 'startups with PMF succeed' (affirming the consequent).
Which of the following most logically completes the argument? A recent survey found that people who exercise daily report 30% fewer days of illness per year than sedentary people. Therefore, _______.
Explanation
(C) is appropriately modest โ the correlation supports 'may contribute', not causation.
The passage's primary purpose is most likely to: (Assume the passage describes debates about the interpretation of the Fourth Amendment.)
Explanation
LSAT RC main-purpose answers favor descriptive/comparative framings over advocacy ones unless the text is clearly polemical.
In the passage, the author's attitude toward the theory can best be described as: (Assume the author presents the theory, notes evidence for and against, and ultimately withholds judgment.)
Explanation
'Notes evidence for and against, withholds judgment' matches neutral exposition, not skepticism.
Principle: A law is just only if it treats similarly-situated people similarly. Which of the following judgments most closely follows this principle?
Explanation
(C) applies the principle: curfews for minors are just IF minors are differently situated. The principle permits different treatment when people aren't similarly situated.
Test-Taking Tips
- 1.Take a timed diagnostic before starting prep โ know your baseline.
- 2.Focus on Logical Reasoning first โ it's half your score.
- 3.Drill question type by question type before mixing.
- 4.Review every wrong AND every 'guessed right' answer.
- 5.Take 1 timed full-length PT per week in the last 6 weeks.
- 6.Learn to skip and return โ don't burn time on one hard question.
Ready to practice more?
Take an interactive quiz with these questions.