Free IELTS Sample Questions with Answers
A complete IELTS Academic practice set across all four sections โ with a full ~900-word Reading passage, 10 annotated questions, Writing Task 1 and Task 2 model responses, and Speaking Part 1/2/3 examples with examiner commentary.
Last updated: 2026 ยท 30 min read
Reading Practice โ The Psychology of Decision-Making
The passage below (~900 words) is representative of IELTS Academic Reading Section 2 or 3 difficulty. Read it carefully, then answer the three question sets that follow. Each question set uses a different IELTS question type. Full answers and explanations are provided.
Reading Passage 2
The Psychology of Decision-Making
A. Every day, human beings make thousands of decisions โ from the trivial (what to eat for breakfast) to the consequential (whether to accept a job offer or leave a long-term relationship). For much of the twentieth century, economists assumed that these decisions were made rationally: that individuals weighed up costs and benefits, processed available information, and selected the option that maximised their overall wellbeing. This model, known as rational choice theory, was elegant and mathematically tractable, but it had a fundamental flaw. It bore little resemblance to the way actual human beings think.
B. The challenge to the rational actor model came most forcefully from the work of psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky in the 1970s. Through a series of carefully designed experiments, they demonstrated that human decision-making is systematically biased in ways that rational choice theory cannot explain. Their research identified a phenomenon they called cognitive bias โ predictable errors in thinking that arise from the mental shortcuts, or heuristics, that the human brain uses to process information quickly. While these shortcuts are efficient, they lead to errors in certain situations, particularly where statistical reasoning or probabilistic thinking is required.
C. One of the most influential concepts to emerge from this research programme is the distinction between two modes of thought, popularised in Kahneman's 2011 book Thinking, Fast and Slow. System 1 thinking is fast, automatic, and largely unconscious. It is the mode we use when we recognise a familiar face, read an emotional expression, or catch a ball. System 2 thinking, by contrast, is slow, effortful, and deliberate. It comes into play when we work through a mathematical problem, carefully read a legal contract, or consciously resist an impulse. Kahneman argues that most of our decisions โ including many we believe to be considered โ are in fact the product of System 1, with System 2 recruited only when a problem exceeds the quick-fire capacity of our intuitive processing.
D. The practical consequences of this dual-process model are far-reaching. In medicine, studies have shown that doctors frequently rely on System 1 when making diagnoses, using pattern recognition developed through experience rather than systematic analysis of symptoms. While this approach is efficient in routine cases, it increases the risk of diagnostic error when patients present with unusual or ambiguous presentations. Similarly, in finance, investors consistently overestimate their ability to predict market movements, a bias known as overconfidence, and hold on to losing investments too long due to loss aversion โ the well-documented tendency to weight losses more heavily than equivalent gains.
E. Perhaps the most practically significant of all the biases identified by behavioural economists is the framing effect. Research has consistently demonstrated that people respond differently to logically identical information depending on how it is presented. When a medical treatment is described as having a '90% survival rate', patients are far more likely to consent to it than when the same treatment is described as having a '10% mortality rate', even though both statements convey precisely the same information. Politicians, advertisers, and public health officials have long understood this, sometimes using it deliberately to influence behaviour in directions they consider desirable.
F. The field of behavioural economics โ the application of psychological insights to economic questions โ has given rise to a policy approach known as 'nudge theory'. Rather than mandating specific behaviours through law or relying on financial incentives to change them, nudge theory proposes that policymakers can improve decisions by redesigning the environments in which choices are made. Making organ donation opt-out rather than opt-in, placing fruit before confectionery in school cafeterias, and automatically enrolling employees in pension schemes are all examples of 'nudges' โ subtle changes to choice architecture that preserve freedom of choice while steering people towards options considered beneficial.
G. Not everyone is convinced, however. Critics of nudge theory argue that it is inherently paternalistic: it assumes that policymakers know better than individuals what is good for them, and manipulates behaviour without full transparency. There is also a question of cultural transferability โ interventions that work in one country may not work in another due to differences in social norms, trust in government, and existing default behaviours. Finally, some researchers note that while nudges can change behaviour in the short term, they may be less effective than traditional interventions โ education, legislation, or financial incentives โ for producing lasting change. The debate over the appropriate role of behavioural insights in public policy remains vigorously contested.
Question Set 1 โ True / False / Not Given (Questions 1โ5)
Do the following statements agree with the information given in the passage? Write TRUE if the statement agrees with the claims of the writer, FALSE if it contradicts the claims of the writer, or NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this.
Rational choice theory assumed that people select the option that maximises their overall wellbeing.
Paragraph A states that rational choice theory assumed individuals 'selected the option that maximised their overall wellbeing'. The statement is a direct paraphrase of this.
Kahneman and Tversky conducted their experiments in collaboration with economists.
The passage identifies Kahneman and Tversky as psychologists and describes their research, but makes no mention of whether they collaborated with economists. The discipline of their collaborators is not addressed.
System 2 thinking is used more frequently than System 1 in everyday decisions.
Paragraph C explicitly states that 'most of our decisions... are in fact the product of System 1, with System 2 recruited only when a problem exceeds the quick-fire capacity of our intuitive processing.' System 2 is used less, not more, frequently.
The framing effect means that people make different choices when the same information is presented in different ways.
Paragraph E defines the framing effect as people responding 'differently to logically identical information depending on how it is presented', then provides the 90%/10% survival example. The statement is a clear paraphrase.
All researchers agree that nudge interventions produce more lasting behavioural change than traditional methods.
Paragraph G states that 'some researchers note that while nudges can change behaviour in the short term, they may be less effective than traditional interventions... for producing lasting change.' This directly contradicts the claim that all researchers agree nudges produce more lasting change.
Question Set 2 โ Matching Headings (Questions 6โ8)
The passage has seven paragraphs labelled AโG. Choose the correct heading for paragraphs B, D, and F from the list below. There are more headings than you need.
- How unconscious shortcuts distort human judgement
- The failure of behavioural interventions in certain cultures
- Biases affecting professional decision-making
- Using choice architecture to guide better decisions
- The debate over rational choice theory
- Two distinct modes of human thought
- How information framing influences medical outcomes
- Criticisms of the nudge approach
Paragraph B
Paragraph B focuses on Kahneman and Tversky's research demonstrating that human decision-making is biased due to cognitive heuristics (mental shortcuts). Heading i matches this. Heading v (rational choice theory debate) describes Paragraph A. Heading iii describes Paragraph D.
Paragraph D
Paragraph D applies the dual-process model to medicine (doctors' diagnostic errors) and finance (overconfidence, loss aversion). Heading iii ('professional decision-making') is the best fit. Heading vi describes Paragraph C, and heading vii is too specific to medical framing (Paragraph E).
Paragraph F
Paragraph F explains nudge theory as redesigning choice environments โ organ donation defaults, cafeteria layouts, pension auto-enrolment. Heading iv ('choice architecture') directly captures this. Heading viii describes Paragraph G (the criticisms), not Paragraph F.
Question Set 3 โ Sentence Completion (Questions 9โ10)
Complete each sentence with NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the passage.
Loss aversion refers to the tendency to weight _______ more heavily than equivalent gains.
Paragraph D: 'loss aversion โ the well-documented tendency to weight losses more heavily than equivalent gains.' The answer is the single word 'losses', taken directly from the passage.
According to critics, nudge theory is paternalistic because it manipulates behaviour without full _______.
Paragraph G: 'it... manipulates behaviour without full transparency.' The single word 'transparency' is the answer, copied directly from the passage.
Listening Sample Questions
The transcript below represents IELTS Listening Section 1 โ a conversation in an everyday social or service context. Read it as if hearing it once, then answer the note completion questions.
Listening Transcript โ Library Membership Enquiry
Librarian: Good afternoon, Westside City Library, how can I help?
Caller: Hello. I've just moved to the area and I was hoping to become a member. Could you tell me how it works?
Librarian: Of course. Membership is completely free for residents. You just need to bring proof of your current address โ a utility bill or official letter is fine โ along with one form of photo ID, such as a passport or driving licence.
Caller: And once I'm a member, how many books can I borrow at once?
Librarian: Standard members can borrow up to eight items at a time. That covers books, DVDs, and audiobooks. The loan period is three weeks for most items, and you can renew up to three times online or by phone.
Caller: Is there a fine if I return things late?
Librarian: Yes, there is a small charge โ it's twenty pence per item per day for standard loans. However, we do send an automatic reminder email two days before the due date, so most people avoid fines altogether.
Caller: That's useful. Do you offer anything for children?
Librarian: Absolutely. We run a Saturday morning reading club for children aged five to eleven โ that's every Saturday from nine until eleven. It's free to attend and children get a reading record card to track the books they've read. Parents or guardians must accompany children under eight.
Caller: My daughter is seven, so that would apply to us. One last question โ are you open on Sundays?
Librarian: We are. On Sundays we're open from eleven in the morning until four in the afternoon. All other days we open at nine and close at six, except Fridays when we stay open until eight.
Caller: Brilliant. I'll come in tomorrow. Thank you so much.
Note Completion โ Write NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS AND/OR A NUMBER
Westside City Library โ New Member Notes
Q1: Membership cost
The librarian says 'Membership is completely free for residents.' The answer is the single word 'free'.
Q2: Maximum items per loan
The librarian says 'Standard members can borrow up to eight items at a time.' Either '8' or 'eight' is acceptable.
Q3: Late fine per item per day
The librarian says 'twenty pence per item per day'. '20p', '20 pence', or 'ยฃ0.20' are all acceptable.
Q4: Reading club start time
The librarian says the reading club runs 'every Saturday from nine until eleven'. The start time is 9:00.
Q5: Sunday opening time
The librarian says 'On Sundays we're open from eleven in the morning until four in the afternoon.' The opening time is 11:00. Note: the closing time (4 pm / 16:00) is given in the question, so the answer is the opening time.
Writing Task 1 โ Line Graph Model Answer
Prompt
The line graph below shows the percentage of adults in different age groups who used the internet daily in a particular country between 2005 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
| Year | 18โ34 | 35โ54 | 55โ74 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 45% | 18% | 5% |
| 2008 | 60% | 30% | 9% |
| 2011 | 74% | 50% | 18% |
| 2014 | 85% | 65% | 32% |
| 2017 | 92% | 78% | 50% |
| 2020 | 97% | 88% | 67% |
Band 7 Model Response (172 words)
The line graph illustrates the proportion of adults in three age groups โ 18 to 34, 35 to 54, and 55 to 74 โ who used the internet on a daily basis in one country over a fifteen-year period from 2005 to 2020.
Overall, daily internet usage increased across all three age groups throughout the period. Younger adults consistently recorded the highest usage rates, while older adults started from a much lower base but showed the most dramatic proportional growth.
In 2005, 45% of adults aged 18 to 34 used the internet daily, a figure that rose steeply to 74% by 2011 before levelling off slightly and reaching 97% in 2020. The 35 to 54 age group followed a broadly similar upward trajectory, growing from 18% in 2005 to 88% by the end of the period, though they consistently lagged behind the youngest group.
The most striking change was seen among adults aged 55 to 74. Beginning at just 5% in 2005, usage in this group climbed sharply โ particularly after 2011 โ to reach 67% by 2020. Despite this growth, a gap of approximately 30 percentage points remained between older and younger adults at the end of the period.
Examiner commentary
โTask Achievement: Band 7.5 โ Overview present and clear. Key features selected and compared accurately. All three groups addressed.
โCoherence & Cohesion: Band 7 โ Well-organised into four clear paragraphs. Cohesive devices used accurately ('broadly similar', 'consistently', 'despite this growth').
โLexical Resource: Band 7 โ Good range of trend vocabulary: 'rose steeply', 'levelling off', 'lagged behind', 'climbed sharply'. Minor repetition ('growth' x2).
โGrammar: Band 7 โ Complex sentences used accurately. Good control of comparatives and passive structures. No significant errors.
Writing Task 2 โ Problem / Solution Model Essay
Prompt
In many cities around the world, there is a growing gap between the wealthy and the poor. What problems does this cause? What measures could be taken to address these problems? Write at least 250 words.
Essay type: Problem / Solution
Band 7.5 Annotated Model Essay (~285 words)
The widening gap between rich and poor in cities worldwide has become one of the most pressing social issues of the twenty-first century. This essay will examine the key problems generated by urban inequality before proposing a range of measures that governments and communities can adopt to tackle them.
Clear paraphrase. Both parts of the question signposted. No opinion required for Problem/Solution โ correctly avoids one.
The most significant consequence of rising inequality is social fragmentation. When large portions of a city's population cannot access adequate housing, healthcare, or education, social cohesion deteriorates and crime rates tend to rise. Research consistently shows that more unequal societies have higher rates of violent crime, mental illness, and drug addiction โ not only among the poor, but across all social groups. A further problem is the erosion of social mobility: when wealth becomes increasingly concentrated, children born into poverty face structural barriers that make it extraordinarily difficult to improve their economic position regardless of their ability or effort. This not only damages individual life outcomes but also limits overall economic productivity by wasting human capital.
Two clearly developed problems. Each supported with evidence. Academic vocabulary: 'social cohesion', 'structural barriers', 'human capital'. Topic sentence clear.
Addressing these problems requires intervention at multiple levels. Firstly, governments should prioritise investment in public services โ particularly healthcare and education โ in lower-income neighbourhoods. Quality schooling available to all children, regardless of parental income, is the most powerful long-term tool for reducing intergenerational poverty. Secondly, progressive taxation policies can help redistribute wealth more equitably, funding both the services described above and affordable housing programmes. Finally, city planners can foster more integrated communities by avoiding the construction of socially homogeneous neighbourhoods, instead designing mixed-income housing developments that encourage interaction between different socioeconomic groups.
Three distinct, well-developed solutions. Logical ordering ('Firstly', 'Secondly', 'Finally'). Good use of hedging not needed here โ solutions stated confidently as appropriate for this essay type.
In conclusion, urban inequality generates serious social problems including increased crime and reduced social mobility, both of which harm entire communities rather than just the poor. Through targeted investment in public services, redistributive taxation, and integrated urban planning, governments can begin to narrow the gap and create cities that are both more equitable and more cohesive.
Restates both problems and solutions in new language. Adds a brief evaluative phrase ('more equitable and more cohesive'). No new arguments introduced.
Both parts fully addressed. Well-developed ideas with clear examples.
Logical structure. Effective use of cohesive devices throughout.
Wide range of vocabulary used accurately. Few errors.
Good variety of structures. Minor errors in complex sentences.
Speaking Sample Questions & Model Answers
Part 1 โ Introduction & Interview (4โ5 minutes)
In Part 1, the examiner asks questions about familiar topics such as home, work, studies, daily routines, interests, and hobbies. Answers should be 2โ4 sentences โ extended but not overly long.
"Do you prefer spending time indoors or outdoors? Why?"
I'd say it depends on the time of year, to be honest. In summer I really enjoy being outside โ I like walking and cycling, and the city has some nice parks. But in winter, when it's cold and dark, I'm much more of an indoors person. I tend to spend my evenings reading or cooking, which I find equally relaxing.
Extends with contrast ('depends on the time of year'). Uses specific activities. Authentic tone. Good vocabulary range for a routine topic.
"Have you ever visited a museum or art gallery? Did you enjoy it?"
Yes, fairly often โ I particularly enjoy natural history and science museums. I went to one recently that had a fascinating exhibition on deep-sea creatures, which I found genuinely compelling. I'm less drawn to traditional art galleries, if I'm honest โ I can appreciate the craftsmanship, but I don't always connect with the work emotionally the way some people seem to.
Answers yes/no then extends with specifics. Shows a nuanced view ('less drawn to') rather than a simple positive response. Vocabulary: 'compelling', 'craftsmanship'.
"Is learning a foreign language important to you? Why / Why not?"
Yes, definitely. I think knowing another language opens doors, both professionally and personally. It changes how you think about your own language and culture, which I find fascinating. I've been learning Spanish for about two years now and even at a basic level it's been hugely rewarding โ I was able to have a simple conversation on a recent trip, which felt like a real achievement.
Personal anecdote grounding an abstract point. Uses causal reasoning ('opens doors', 'changes how you think'). Authentic self-assessment ('basic level').
Part 2 โ Individual Long Turn (1โ2 minutes)
Describe an important decision you have made in your life.
You should say:
- what the decision was
- when and why you made it
- what the outcome was
and explain why this decision was important to you.
"The decision I'd like to talk about is one I made about four years ago, when I chose to leave a stable but unfulfilling office job to go back to university and study something I was genuinely passionate about."
"At the time I had been working in administration for three years. The work was secure and well-paid, but I found myself dreading Monday mornings and feeling like I wasn't using my abilities or interests. A friend had gone back to study as a mature student and found it transformative, which planted the idea in my mind. After a lot of deliberation โ probably six months of it โ I applied for a degree course in environmental science."
"It wasn't easy financially โ I took out a student loan and had to take on part-time work during term time. But the change in my motivation and overall happiness was immediate and significant. I graduated two years ago and now work in a field I find genuinely meaningful."
"I think the main reason it felt so important was that it required me to prioritise long-term fulfilment over short-term security, which is difficult for most people. It taught me something about taking calculated risks and trusting my own judgement โ lessons I've applied many times since."
Part 3 โ Two-Way Discussion (4โ5 minutes)
Part 3 moves from personal experience to more abstract, analytical questions on the same theme. Aim for extended, balanced responses of 5โ8 sentences.
"Why do you think some people find it difficult to make important decisions?"
I think there are a few different reasons, depending on the person. For some, it's a fear of regret โ the worry that whichever option you choose, you'll spend years wondering whether the other path would have been better. For others, it's a lack of self-confidence: they don't trust their own judgement enough to commit to a course of action. There's also an element of information overload in modern life โ we often have too many options and too much conflicting advice, which can make even straightforward decisions feel overwhelming. I think this is sometimes described as 'analysis paralysis' โ where the more you think, the harder it becomes to decide.
Three distinct reasons โ demonstrates analytical thinking. Uses hedging ('I think', 'sometimes'). Topic-specific vocabulary: 'analysis paralysis', 'information overload'. Good fluency and cohesion.
"To what extent do you think governments should make decisions for individuals, rather than leaving them to decide for themselves?"
That's a question that gets to the heart of some fundamental political debates. On one hand, I think there are clearly situations where government intervention is justified โ particularly where individual choices cause harm to others, or where people lack the information or cognitive capacity to make truly informed decisions. Public health is a good example: we don't generally allow individuals to decide whether to drive on the left or right side of the road. On the other hand, I believe personal autonomy is a core value that should be protected as far as possible. I think the most defensible position is probably the 'nudge' approach โ designing systems that make good choices easier without removing freedom entirely. Where mandatory intervention is genuinely necessary, it should be transparent and evidence-based.
Balanced response with a clear, nuanced conclusion. Uses 'on one hand/on the other hand' effectively. Sophisticated vocabulary: 'personal autonomy', 'defensible', 'mandatory'. References a real concept (nudge theory) naturally.
IELTS Quick Facts
Key rules to remember
โReading and Listening โ there is no penalty for wrong answers. Always guess if you are unsure.
โSentence Completion answers must come from the passage itself, in the exact form they appear.
โTrue/False/Not Given and Yes/No/Not Given are different question types โ True/False/Not Given applies to factual claims; Yes/No/Not Given applies to the writer's views.
โWriting Task 1 overview paragraph is not optional โ it is essential for Band 6+ in Task Achievement.
โSpeaking Part 2 โ you have exactly 1 minute to make notes before speaking. Use it.
โA Band 7 across all four sections gives an overall 7.0. One Band 8 with three Band 7s gives 7.25, which rounds to 7.5.
Ready for a full IELTS practice test?
Take a complete IELTS Academic Reading or Writing practice test โ free, no account required. Get instant AI-scored feedback on your Writing responses.